22 August 2009
I am so over Edward Cullen...
My affections have been transferred from Edward Cullen (of Twilight) to Eric Northman (of True Blood). I mean really, who wouldn't prefer a 6'4 viking hunk to a sullen teenage virgin? Yum.
Labels: babble
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
God, I know! I don't normally get my panties in a twist watching soft core porn, but godammit! He should have been Lestat instead of that pansy Cruise.
This is why Edward Cullen never existed to me... why have a boy when you can have an Eric?
You're definitely not alone! Team Eric FTW!
You ladies aren't playing. Every time I hear someone talking about Edward I think, "there is no way they have seen Eric, if they think that emo teenage vampire is hot." Who doesn't need a tall Norwegian vamp in their life?
As much as I agree with the disbandment of Team Edward (really, once it's on a Zazzle Tshirt, it might be WAY over...), sadly your boy Eric bears an uncanny resemblance one of my friends who was imprinted on me as a little brother. Imma go watch Dracula now and be glad the Old-man doesn't mind marrying people ~my age.
For me it was all about having a crush on Eric in the book, and that just kind of tranferred to Eric in the series. In my head he is even hotter than TV Eric. I also like TV Eric better with long hair.
My friend likes Quinn better. We've decided we are each in love with what we cannot have...he dates bad boys and I am married to a good boy. So, I'm crushing on the bad boy while he is crushing on the good boy.
Not only do I prefer a tall Viking hunk... I married one. I win!
On a related tangent, if anyone's on Facebook, look up the group "Brunette Girls for Blond Guys."
YES PLEASE! True Blood is sooo goood!
http://workitberk.blogspot.com
Alright I'm glad to see I'm not the only one in love with this one. I'm embarrassed to admit that...what am I like 14? {hiding face}
The good news: Entertainment Weekly rated Alex Skarsgard #3 on their Hotties '09 list.
The questionable news: Your old boy Pattinson is #1. Gawd, they are SO 2008!
http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20153312_20153315_20300307,00.html
Post a Comment